Public Safety Realignment Transitional Housing Agreement

On Oct 8th, the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors approved on the consent calendar:  

Public Safety Realignment Transitional Housing Agreement 

Authorize the Chief Probation Officer to execute a professional services agreement with Interfaith Shelter Network, Inc. for the initial term October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2027, in the amount of $1,247,892 to provide transitional housing beds and services for individuals on felony probation and to execute up to two one-year renewal options for a maximum five-year agreement value of $2,188,000.

The Probation Department requests Board approval to execute a professional services agreement with Interfaith Shelter Network, Inc. (IFSN) to provide transitional housing services for homeless Public Safety Realignment individuals and others on felony probation being supervised in the community.  Under this Agreement, IFSN will operate drug- and alcohol-free residential facilities to provide these probationers with an out-of-custody structured housing environment, including wrap-around supportive services to assist with placement into permanent housing and transitioning back into the community.  The probationers participating in this program are those who would otherwise be living marginally in the community with little or no support and who would likely resort to criminal behavior without supportive housing and Probation oversight.  The program is intended to reduce recidivism and enhance public safety by providing a secure, sober living environment for participants.

The Sonoma County Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) allocates funding for this program and has approved the fiscal year 24-25 expenses.  Future funding will depend upon continued CCP approval.

Funding for the contract comes from state legislation (AB109, 2011) which transferred responsibility for managing select adult offenders from the state to California counties.  As of June 2024, Sonoma County Probation supervises 440 individuals.   The state provides funding to help manage this increased responsibility, which the CCP, in turn, allocates, pending Board approval.  Because many realigned offenders are homeless and lack the community connections and resources needed to secure stable housing, the CCP has allocated funding for transitional housing every year since 2011.

The Probation Department issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) announcement in June 2024, which was distributed to 487 known organizations that might have interest in operating transitional housing facilities for probationers as well as 2,200 notifications to subscribers on Purchasing’s RFP posting list. 

The RFP sought proposals from one or more organizations to provide at least 26 transitional housing beds for probationers, most of whom will be individuals on felony probation and some of whom will be sex offenders.  In addition to beds, the RFP requested an array of supportive services to help probationers stabilize their lives and become productive community members.  Finally, the RFP required that the successful organization(s) develop a quality assurance plan to ensure high service standards and report on outputs and outcomes to help stakeholders determine program performance.

IFSN was the only organization to submit a proposal.  A panel of representatives from the Probation Department and the Department of Health Services rated the proposal using clear criteria such as qualifications and experience, staffing, program services, and cost of service.  Based on its proposal review, the evaluation committee recommends awarding transitional housing services to IFSN.

While this program is intended primarily for realigned offenders, it will also be available for non-realigned individuals on felony probation as space permits.  During an intake process, Probation and IFSN will coordinate to determine which supportive services IFSN will provide to offenders.  Available services include case management; individual therapy; individual and group counseling; skill building; referrals for substance abuse, healthcare, food, and general assistance services; employment preparation; and permanent housing search and placement assistance.  IFSN will coordinate supportive services with offenders’ supervising Probation Officers to address individual needs without duplicating services from other sources.  All therapy and counseling services will be conducted by licensed therapists or interns under the supervision of a licensed clinical director. 

IFSN currently provides 26 beds.  Under the new contract, IFSN will provide 30 beds distributed among multiple houses in Santa Rosa and Rohnert Park.  The additional four beds will be for a female-only home in Santa Rosa.

Additionally, IFSN will develop and implement quality assurance and outcome reporting plans.  Quality assurance plans ensure, for example, that staff receives proper training, resources, and certifications, and that facilities are clean, safe, and up to code.  Outcome reporting can help the CCP and other stakeholders determine program performance.  Example data points include residents’ post-discharge living arrangements, success in completing programming, and behavioral changes such as improved cooperation, communication, and conflict resolution.

 Gregory Fearon

Sonoma County Opioid Settlement

The Sonoma County Board of Supervisors held a workshop on the expected $43 million which they have been told to expect from accepted prescription opioid litigation settlements to fund address the growing fentanyl and other serious drug abuse problems with “core abatement strategies” in the County. Many more lawsuits are pending, and the total which could be received by the County over the next few years may approach $100 million.

Currently, the County has $12 million in its fund balance, and is required to obligate or expend $2.5 million of it by next spring (one year after receipt). Here is a link to the video of the workshop.

Santa Rosa’s ARPA Funding

In response to a Public Record Request, the City of Santa Rosa has responded to questions on the use of its American Rescue Program Act federal allocation. HEAPA obtained from them last month their quarterly report to the U.S. Treasury, and raised questions about it. Our email, and the City response re below:

Greetings!

Thank you very much for your prompt response to my public records request for the City’s quarterly report to the Treasury Department on the use of American Rescue Program Act funds.  I have incorporated the information in it into the original spreadsheet you provided me when the City allocated ARPA and PG&E funding (attached).  By doing so, I can better understand the progress of the programs begun by it, and the changes you have made to the City’s original decisions.

What is clear from the report is that the City has declared obligations to spend $22,629,794, and has expended $16,660,661 against those obligations.  That leaves a balance of expenditures of a little under $6 million.  Maxing out the expenditures on remaining obligations, you should be able to spend about $3.5 million of those remaining funds within your program design.  That will leave $2.5 million in funds to be re-obligated before December 31, 2024.  How and when will the Council make those additional obligations?

The only other question I have is “What happened to the original obligation of $10 million for the Roseland Community Center?”  The quarterly report seems to indicate that it has been shifted into the category of “Revenue Replacement”.  Your report states “Funding under the revenue loss provision will be allocated towards Roseland Community Center. Construction of Roseland Community Center would provide a publicly owned Community Center in Roseland which would ensure a culturally safe space and sense of belonging, would reflect the voices of the community in the design process, represent an equitable investment in the City infrastructure for the newly annexed Roseland, and provide more opportunities for the City’s youth and elders.”    May I assume that the shift to Revenue Replacement accounts for the drop in overall obligations from $34,937,000 originally to the current figure of $22,629,794?  The City is still going to apply the ARPA funding to the Roseland Community Center, correct?

Again, thanks for the report. 

Gregory Fearon

Hi Gregory,

I’ll try to answer your questions below, but I’m also available if you want talk this through – just let me know and I’ll set something up.  Also, staff will be presenting an update to Council on the use of all ARPA funds scheduled for November 12.

To date, Santa Rosa has spent or encumbered approximately $24.8 million.  All funds must be spent or under contract by December 31, 2024, or the funds not under contract would be returned to US Treasury.  

There have been no changes to the initial allocation of $10 million for the “Roseland Community Center,” which is now known as the Hearn Community Hub project.  The designation of Revenue Replacement reflects the type of expenditure category allowed in the ARPA legislation and US Treasury guidance.  Treasury allows jurisdictions to claim a lump sum of $10 million to cover revenue losses, and those funds could be used for general government services, which provided more flexibility to use the funds on that capital project.  In the initial ruling from Treasury, the use of funds on capital projects were restrictive, so the change in guidance benefited the City. 

Treasury recently provided guidance on the use of ARPA funds for certain transportation projects.  This allowed us to move $2 million from the Samuel Jones Hall Capital Projects allocation to the Hearn Community Hub project for site development.  This was another benefit to the City as the SJH projects likely wouldn’t have met the obligation deadline, and would have been challenging to justify with Treasury.  I’ve attached the staff report from the December 12, 2023, that discussed this move, along with an update on the other projects.

I hope this helps.  Again, I’m available to meet to discuss in more detail if you’d like. 

Alan

Alan Alton Chief Financial Officer 
Finance Department 
90 Santa Rosa Avenue | Santa Rosa, CA 95404 
Tel. (707) 543-3093 | Cell (707) 312-4413 |aalton@srcity.org 

Santa Rosa City Council ARPA Decisions in December of 2023

June 30th Treasury Report from Santa Rosa

California Interagency Council on Homelessness

Today’s meeting adopted the Draft Three-Year Action Plan (2025-2027). In a few days, it should be up on the CAL-ICH website, and a link to it will appear here. The Department Updates are a good summary of what’s happening at the State and Federal Level concerning homelessness programs. Here is a link to the Meeting Presentation, which contains valuable perspectives on California’s unhoused. In another announcement today, the Governor appointed Kim Johnson, Director of the Department of Social Services to become Director of the Department of Health Services, replacing Mark Ghaly, who stepped down and five years with the Department.

CAL ICH September 5th Meeting Recording

Santa Rosa ARPA Report

Greetings!

Thank you very much for your prompt response to my public records request for the City’s quarterly report to the Treasury Department on the use of American Rescue Program Act funds.  I have incorporated the information in it into the original spreadsheet you provided me when the City allocated ARPA and PG&E funding (attached).  By doing so, I can better understand the progress of the programs begun by it, and the changes you have made to the City’s original decisions.

What is clear from the report is that the City has declared obligations to spend $22,629,794, and has expended $16,660,661 against those obligations.  That leaves a balance of expenditures of a little under $6 million.  Maxing out the expenditures on remaining obligations, you should be able to spend about $3.5 million of those remaining funds within your program design.  That will leave $2.5 million in funds to be re-obligated before December 31, 2024.  How and when will the Council make those additional obligations?

The only other question I have is “What happened to the original obligation of $10 million for the Roseland Community Center?”  The quarterly report seems to indicate that it has been shifted into the category of “Revenue Replacement”.  Your report states “Funding under the revenue loss provision will be allocated towards Roseland Community Center. Construction of Roseland Community Center would provide a publicly owned Community Center in Roseland which would ensure a culturally safe space and sense of belonging, would reflect the voices of the community in the design process, represent an equitable investment in the City infrastructure for the newly annexed Roseland, and provide more opportunities for the City’s youth and elders.”    May I assume that the shift to Revenue Replacement accounts for the drop in overall obligations from $34,937,000 originally to the current figure of $22,629,794?  The City is still going to apply the ARPA funding to the Roseland Community Center, correct?

Again, thanks for the report. 

Gregory Fearon

Sonoma County Measure O Oversight

At the August 21st quarterly meeting of the Sonoma County Measure O Oversight Committee, discussions were held on the Crisis Care Mobile Response Program (see another post on this website), Measure O fund balances, Committee member terms of office (hopefully all being re-appointed), a soon-to-be-released NOFA (detailed in another post), and the progress of Measure O-funded projects.

Fund Balances. We’re still carrying reserves which the Committee feels are unnecessarily high. FY23-24 ending balance is projected in the draft annual report as $33.4 million. Even with an expected $43.7 million in expenditures in FY24-25, we would still retain a balance of $22.5 million.

Measure O Projects. See multi-year spreadsheet.

Homeless Encampments

On July 25, 2024, Governor Gavin Newsom issued an Executive Order N-1-24, mandating state agencies to move with urgency and compassion to adopt clear policies for addressing homeless encampments on state property, and encouraging local governments to adopt policies that emulate the state’s approach. Shortly after the meeting of the Advisory Council to the California Interagency Council on Homeless (CalICH), an emergency teleconference was held to brief its members, and local government representatives, on the order. Coming this week to this post is the video recording.

Officials clear homeless encampment at California state beach

Valuable News (2023 & 0224)

Can licensed tent villages ease California’s homelessness epidemic? This nonprofit thinks so

UPDATE: Is San Jose spending too much on homeless outreach?

Sonoma County is building more permanent housing for unhoused people

Sonoma County nonprofit finds success renting shared homes to chronically homeless

Solid Ground Evaluations

The Unhoused in Reseda Are Moved Safely Inside

California gave Sacramento $25M for homeless at American River Parkway. Why hasn’t it spent it?