County Safety Net Contracts

HEAPA has been working on providing public access to the safety net contracts issued by Sonoma County over the past year, and those which it will depend upon to serve the residents of the County for the next three years. We’re still working on a single spreadsheet which lists all of the $802 million the Department of Health Services has included in its Three-Year Integrated Plan for 2026-2029. When done, you will not only be able to see what the county is providing, but it will contain links to the actual contracts.

But while we work on the spreadsheet for current year contracts, we couldn’t think of any reason why we couldn’t begin to share a folder we have which contains the past year contracts the Health Department sent us in response to our pubic records request. We also have a folder with some past year contracts issued by the Human Services Department.

We’re eager to receive all of the safety net contracts issued by the County in both departments for the current year. That spreadsheet should give all of us a much clearer picture of the impacts of federal and state cutbacks in funding, and provide all of us with exactly what we can expect of the hardworking staff in the dozens of programs we have depended upon in the past to support our futures.

Sonoma County CARE Court and Mental Health Diversion Overview

Created on Jul 27, 2026 17:54:41

Summary

You attended a meeting focused on behavioral health and legal petition processes, specifically touching on Care Court proceedings. The group discussed the challenges of case management, featuring stories of individuals overcoming severe symptoms to re-engage with their families. Key logistics included upcoming participation in the NAMI Walk on October 17th, contact information for licensed clinicians like Colleen Christie and Jackie Dean, and the technicalities of e-filing court petitions while maintaining client confidentiality.

CARE Court Overview and Eligibility

  • Civil, not criminal court: Focuses on voluntary engagement with no risk of jail
  • Qualifying diagnoses: Schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and psychotic disorders
  • Expanded as of Jan 1, 2025, to include bipolar disorder with psychotic features
  • Does not cover autism, traumatic brain injury (TBI), or personality disorders without psychosis
  • Filing process: Requires CARE-100 and CARE-101 forms
  • Evidence of diagnosis (e.g., hospital discharge, clinical records) must be attached
  • Filing available in person at civil clerk’s office or via e-filing

Petitioner Categories

  • Family/Close Contacts: Parents, spouses, siblings, roommates, or partners
  • First Responders: Law enforcement, fire departments, or mobile crisis units (e.g., inRESPONSE)
  • Licensed Clinicians: Behavioral health providers (LMFTs, LCSWs)
  • Self-referral: Individuals meeting criteria can technically file for themselves
  • Court/Justice Partners: Increasing trend of direct referrals from criminal or LPS courts

Operational Workflow

  • Prima Facie Showing: Judge reviews filing to ensure petitioner relationship and qualifying diagnosis exist
  • Behavioral Health Substitution: Once accepted, County Behavioral Health takes over as petitioner from families or first responders
  • Service of Process: Significant delays occur when potential respondents are unhoused or difficult to locate
  • Treatment Team: Includes the judge, respondent’s counsel (Public Defender), County Counsel, and clinicians

Housing and Resources

  • BHBH Housing (Arrowwood): 80-90 beds available for CARE Court and diversion clients
  • Facility is unlocked with a curfew (typically 10 PM – 6 AM)
  • Provides up to one year of supportive services
  • Warm Handoffs: Efforts made to coordinate releases from jail to community care to avoid “dumping” on the street

Parallel Systems and Diversion

  • Mental Health Diversion: Runs in parallel with CARE Court for justice-involved individuals
  • IST (Incompetent to Stand Trial): New funding used for a dedicated attorney to prevent state hospital transfers
  • by providing local treatment
  • Quota/Fine System: Counties are fined (e.g., $2.9M) if they exceed quotas for sending people to State Hospitals
  • Conservatorship (LPS): Distinct from CARE Court; involves three-day (5150) to one-year holds for “grave disability”

We can and must do better.

Mayor Stapp, and members of the City Council:

Yesterday, my colleagues and I on your Housing Authority authorized the extension and subordination of long-term loans made on your behalf to allow community providers of low cost housing to continue or transfer program operations for properties in Santa Rosa used to house autistic and homeless individuals and families.  It was particularly satisfying to me because I headed the requesting agencies when the loans were first made.  But much has changed in America for those of us dedicated to providing low cost homes.

Rental prices for nonprofit housing are dependent on the cost of loans we needed to build the housing.  The fewer and cheaper our loans, the lower the rents could be, and the more we could spend on maintaining the units. Yesterday’s actions by the Housing Authority insured you’ll have thirty more years of low rents and healthy facilities.  Housing built with state grants which don’t require repayment, as in agenda item 13.6, allow us to provide homes for our lowest income residents.  

But it takes more than a facility to ease someone back inside whose life has been destroyed on the streets.  Caritas Phase II is intended for veterans, chronic homeless, and those at risk of homelessness.  And no expectation of success can be counted on unless the addition of mental health and substance use disorder services are provided.  Over the past forty years, I can tell you that nothing has been clearer. The application you are considering approving tonight needs more than California Homekey+ facility funding.  It needs mental health and substance use disorder funding from the County and state to successfully meet the needs of your residents.

Email to the Director of Sonoma County Department of Health Services

Santa Rosa is proposing to approve submission of a $30 million HomeKey+ application with Burbank Housing Development Corporation for 63 units aimed at “the development of permanent supportive housing for Veterans and individuals with mental health or substance use disorders who are at risk of or are experiencing homelessness”.  The application supports Caritas Homes Phase II.  

Caritas Homes Phase II is the final stage of the larger Caritas Village project consisting of Caritas Center, a comprehensive housing-focused homeless services facility including transitional and interim housing located at 301 6th Street, and Caritas Homes Phase I, a 64-unit affordable permanent supportive housing development located at 340 7th Street. Both Caritas Center and Caritas Homes Phase I are complete and operational. 

As you are acutely aware, much effort has been expended over the past year by your Department, and the Sonoma County Homeless Coalition, to rectify the failure to anticipate and include adequate resident support services in successfully-acquired Homekey-funded project sites from the beginning of their development.  These projects were not, however, anticipated to serve the more severely mentally-ill and substance-using resident populations as are HomeKey+ projects funded by Proposition One.

But having worked with your staff and the community to understand the limits of funding housing needs with Proposition One funding for moderate mental health and substance use residents, I have to admit that this application to Prop One funding now confuses me.  It sure does look like the City and Burbank are proposing building units that will house residents whose needs combine mental health and substance use with chronic homelessness and veteran status.  If they anticipated serving the clients you claim are yours, wouldn’t they need to obtain funding from you to do it more succesfully?

I am also disappointed that the application has received no discussion at the Sonoma County Homeless Coalition, Behavioral Health Board, or City of Santa Rosa Housing Authority.  It is another example of the continuation of silo-focused planning in a county which should have learned better by now.

Important Meeting In Sacramento for Nonprofits

Greetings!

Almost a year ago, a joint hearing of the California Senate and Assembly Select Committees on the Nonprofits was held in room 1200 of the State Capitol.  The attached agenda and background paper were provided.

In two weeks, another joint hearing will occur.

Joint Select Committee Hearing Set
We encourage you to tune into – or attend – the upcoming Joint Hearing of the Senate and Assembly Select Committees on the Nonprofit Sector. 
This is an important opportunity for state representatives to gain deeper insights into the current challenges facing nonprofits in California. The hearing is scheduled for 1:30pm, Wednesday August 5th (in Capitol Room 126, for those in Sacramento). 
Two panels of nonprofit leaders – including CalNonprofits CEO Geoff Green – will discuss a number of critical issues, including:The economic impact of our state’s nonprofit sectorThe DOJs efforts to modernize its Registry of Charities and FundraisersRecommendations for improving how the state works with its nonprofit partners 
CalNonprofits was instrumental in the creation of these two important committees, which provide leadership in Sacramento on behalf of our sector and help inform legislators about the critical role nonprofits play in communities across the state. 
How to watch/attend:💻 Stream it live👤 Attend in person: Capitol Room 126, Sacramento 95814

You don’t want to miss it.

Ana Booker Appointed to the Behavioral Health Board

I talked for an hour with Ana Booker, recently appointed to the Behavioral Health Board by Supervisor James Gore. She has attended a past meetings of the Board, though has missed the past two meetings while traveling. “I can’t believe they haven’t spent more time talking to themselves about their perceptions of Health Department program conditions.” said Booker, who serves as Outreach Manager for West County Community Services. “I’m learning as quickly and thoroughly as I can about why it is so hard for our clients to obtain services and housing”. Booker also serves as a Navigator within InRESPONSE, Santa Rosa’s mobile crisis support program, funded by the County Department of Health Services through Measure O funding.

Two Gifts from the Board of Supervisors: A Moonshot and New Health Officer

This morning, the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors gave the Department of Health Services Director (Nolan Sullivan) two gifts. The first was the appointment, starting tomorrow, of Mia Shim, MD, MPH as the new Sonoma County Health Officer. Dr. Shim served recently as interim health officer and chief medical officer for Public Health in Seattle, Kings County, Washington, one of the largest local public health systems in the country – serving 2.3 million residents. More on her career can be found here.

The second gift was what Nolan described as “a moonshot, and probably a career-defining project”. Authorizing the termination of a decade-old effort to utilize $40 million in State funding to build a 72-bed facility for mental health treatment and recovery of jail inmates, and the redirection of $27 million in local match funding and up to $9 million in Opioid Settlement funding, the Board approved the acceptance of a new $54 million State grant to build two 16-bed Mental Health Recovery Centers and fifty-six Substance Disorder beds on either or both of the current Orenda Center Detox site and Los Guillicos properties in Eastern Santa Rosa. Read more on a previous HEAPA post.

The Board voted to give permission to the Department to fast-track a community Request for Design-Build Proposals in the two months to see if the remaining gap in projected costs can be cut to what might possibly be funded from every other County and regionally-contracted source imaginable. “If we fail, we’ll continue to pay an enormous amount of money to send our residents to distant private facilities far from their families”, said Director Sullivan.

HEAPA Responding to Homeless Power and Food Emergencies

Those without system power are vulnerable when medical and food requirements demand life-sustaining equipment. And when power outages, of whatever duration, cease the operation of refrigeration, body-support, and mobility devices, it is critically important. HEAPA has purchased some multi-use, portable power batteries which will be targeted to homes and encampments which it will identify as critical locations to support the provision of food and medical support to homeless and at risk of homeless in our community. Our efforts should be directed toward those with the least amount of power to meet basic needs.

County Behavioral Health Facilities in Trouble

As you might have read in the PD this morning, the grant awarded to the County last year to build additional locked beds for seriously mentally ill residents may be returned to the State. On Tuesday, The Department of Health Services is requesting guidance from the Board on whether to move ahead with the original grant to build 64 Mental Health Treatment Center locked beds and 40 Substance Use Disorder Treatment beds using $67 million from the State and $61 million in local funding or one of two alternate proposals suggested by the Department. One would cut the locked facility in half and expand the SUD by 16 beds with $13 million less state funds and $12 million less in local funding. The other would decline the state grant and both facilities.

Local funding being suggested includes repurposing a $40 million grant received in 2015 to build a 72-bed facility for mental health treatment and rehabilitation of inmates. The Department reports that construction and operation costs have exceeded the original award, and the Behavioral Health Housing Unit Project is no longer feasible. Additionally, $3.8 million in Opioid Settlement funding is being suggested.

The Board of Supervisors discussion will occur at their afternoon session beginning at 1:30pm on Tuesday.

Sonoma County Behavioral Health Board Meeting

The Sonoma County Behaviorl Health Board held its monthly meeting on June 16th from 5-7pm at 1440 Neotomas Ave, It was a detailed discussion regarding the Substance Use Disorder (SUD) referral process and the inefficiencies of the current access line. A key takeaway was the recommendation to send individuals directly to treatment facilities rather than the central access line to avoid delays and potential relapses. The conversation also touched on the impact of Measure O and opioid settlement funds in Sonoma County, emphasizing the community’s commitment to improving mental health and addiction services.

Legislative and Budget Updates

Mobile Crisis Mandate: The latest State budget revision suggests the mandated mobile crisis response will be preserved, potentially providing state Medi-Cal reimbursement. Measure O Oversight board sent a formal letter to the Board of Supervisors advocating for full funding of the CAPE teams. Subsequently, the Board of Supervisors voted to restore all five CAPE (school-based) teams, and fully staff the Crisis Stabilization Unit (CSU). CAPE teams provide mobile crisis intervention, assessment, and drug counseling directly in high schools in Santa Rosa and satellite areas. discussed was a strategy to transition CAPE to a mandated service category to protect it from future budget cuts. Additionally, the Department announced that efforts are underway to opt into the IMD (Institute for Mental Disease) waiver by August 1st in order to receive Medi-Cal reimbursement for short-term hospital stays (18-65 age group).

Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Expansion

Recovery Housing: Buckelew was awarded $3.8M for 60-69 sober living beds; project includes unique support for men with children. Youth Services: the Department (DHS) is opening a new facility near Los Guilicos (Valley of the Moon) to provide adolescent residential treatment, withdrawal management, and outpatient care (completion July 1st; licensing 12-18 months).

Tribal Partnerships: DHS executed a MOU with Sonoma County Indian Health Project for traditional healing practices (music therapy, drum circles, herbal remedies). New Outpatient Providers: Paramita, Cura Vita, and Sion have launched or are expanding services; West County Health Centers starting drug treatment in the Russian River area.

Access Strategy: Encouraging direct entry at provider sites rather than going through the central county access line to prevent delays and relapses. Mental Health Integration: Organized Delivery System (ODS) requires licensed practitioners (LCSW/LMFT) to sign off on SUD assessments, forcing better integration.

Probation and Courts: DHS is implementing medical necessity-driven treatment recommendations in court settings rather than arbitrary 9-month sentences.

Behavioral Health Connect: New mandates for evidence-based practices (IPS for employment, Clubhouse services) launching in October.

Stay tuned: HEAPA will publish a link to the video recording of the meeting.